Removing Contact Barriers for Older Adults

During a recent Digital Inclusion event, we explored the challenges that older adults face when trying to contact companies online. Many of these difficulties are linked to digital friction, the small but significant obstacles that make customer service journeys harder than they should be.

Organisations aiming to stay accessible often find that removing these barriers is critical to building customer trust. The issue is particularly pressing in sectors such as insurance and finance, where clarity, reassurance, and trust are essential.

Why Digital Friction Matters for Older People

Older customers are increasingly online, yet many still struggle with essential digital interactions. Common challenges include:

  • Low confidence when navigating complex websites

  • Difficulty with digital-first customer service journeys

  • A strong preference for speaking directly to a person, especially for financial or sensitive issues

When services are designed with automation as the default, older adults may feel digitally excluded. Digital friction creates frustration, leads to abandonment, and forces customers into alternative channels that are less efficient for them and often more costly for organisations.

Common Barriers in the Contact Journey

Older people encounter a range of obstacles when trying to get support online, many of which create unnecessary digital friction. Identifying these issues through Audits & Inclusive User Testing is often the first step to creating more inclusive customer experiences. These barriers include:

1. Overwhelming Help Pages

Help and support sections often feature dozens of links, options, and decision trees. This can be cognitively overwhelming and lead to confusion or “decision paralysis,” particularly for elderly internet users unfamiliar with technical terms or digital conventions.

2. Reliance on Chatbots (Automated Live Chat)

Many companies now offer live chat support, but in many cases, this is handled by a chatbot before human agents are available.

These bots:

  • Often use scripted responses or keyword triggers

  • May not recognise natural language, spelling errors, or vague questions

  • Can hide real contact options behind several failed attempts to “self-serve”

  • Sometimes simulate human interaction without clearly disclosing they’re automated

For older users, this can be frustrating or misleading. Many type long, polite queries expecting a person, only to receive unhelpful automated responses or be looped back to FAQ articles they’ve already seen. Such patterns create a clear contact barrier that reduces trust.

Exploring our Digital Inclusion Lab offers a way to step into the shoes of your users and understand first-hand how automated systems can either support or exclude them.

3. Hidden or De-emphasised Phone Numbers

Many users, especially older ones, would prefer to speak to a human directly. However, phone contact options are often buried behind web forms, chat pop-ups, or multiple navigation layers. Such practices increase the risk of digital exclusion elderly customers may already face.

4. CAPTCHAs and Security Friction

To complete contact forms or request a call-back, users are often asked to solve a CAPTCHA (for example, “click all the pictures with traffic lights”). These are notoriously difficult for people with visual, motor, or cognitive impairments and particularly discouraging for older users. In many cases, they amplify digital friction unnecessarily.

How many older people are digitally excluded?

According to Age UK, approximately 2.4 million (19%) older people are digitally excluded. Elderly internet users may be comfortable with messaging or browsing but find services such as online banking, healthcare, and insurance too complex. The digital exclusion elderly customers experience is not only about access to devices but also about confronting processes that feel overwhelming or inaccessible.

How can we ensure digital inclusion for older adults?

Organisations can take practical steps to reduce barriers and design services that work for elderly internet users as well as younger ones.

1. Make Phone Contact Easy to Find

  • Include phone numbers on all major contact or help pages

  • Don’t bury them behind chatbots or dropdown menus

  • Use large text and clearly state operating hours

2. Be Transparent About Live Chat

  • Clearly indicate whether a chat is automated or human

  • Allow users to escalate to a real person early in the conversation

  • Avoid misleading interfaces that mimic human interaction when it is not available

3. Simplify Help Pages

  • Limit the number of links or decision points per page

  • Use clear, question-based headings like “I still need help” or “Speak to someone”

  • Reduce complexity that creates unnecessary digital friction for elderly internet users

4. Avoid Visual CAPTCHAs Where Possible

  • Use accessible alternatives such as invisible CAPTCHA or email confirmation

  • Avoid anything that requires dragging, clicking images, or deciphering text

5. Offer Channel Choice Without Penalty

  • Let users choose how they want to engage: phone, email, or live chat

  • Avoid nudging all users toward one “preferred” channel unless it is clearly in their interest

  • Support genuine digital inclusion for older adults by offering flexibility

6. Test with Older Users Directly

  • Watch how older people try to contact your services

  • Spot barriers like unclear navigation, hidden phone numbers, or difficult CAPTCHAs

  • Use insights from inclusive user testing to fix issues early and reduce digital friction

Final Thoughts

Many of these design patterns are unintentional, but they disproportionately affect older adults. Simplifying the path to contact, reducing automation friction, and keeping human help easily accessible can significantly improve customer satisfaction and retention.

Good accessibility is not just about compliance; it is about keeping services open to everyone. Organisations that reduce digital friction and address each contact barrier will create fairer, more trustworthy customer experiences for all.

Learn more about practical ways to achieve digital inclusion for elderly and older adults at Arc Inclusion.

Similar posts

Discover how we’ve helped organisations overcome accessibility challenges and achieve success.

FAQs

Digital exclusion for the elderly refers to the barriers that prevent older people from accessing or benefiting from online services. It may stem from lack of confidence, poor design choices, or inaccessible processes that amplify digital friction in everyday interactions.

Age influences digital inclusion through both experience and physical changes. Many older people did not grow up with technology, so digital services feel less intuitive. Challenges such as reduced vision or dexterity can increase the risk of encountering digital friction during online tasks.

 

Insights from inclusive research show how different age groups interact with digital services and where adjustments are most needed.

Older adults are more at risk because many services prioritise digital-first approaches without considering their needs. Hidden phone numbers, reliance on automated chat, and inaccessible security checks create repeated contact barriers that disproportionately affect older users.

Older adults engage more successfully with technology when training and support are tailored. Local workshops, trusted community groups, and simplified devices can help. Reducing digital friction is essential, as early negative experiences often discourage continued use.

Website accessibility monitoring is the fundamental process of scanning your website to detect any issues that could prevent users with disabilities from using it. Automated web accessibility monitoring tools continuously check for accessibility issues across your site, providing instant alerts for new and updated content, as well as your overall site health.

 

They track compliance with standards like the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and show you how accessible your site is, where it should be, and what improvements should be made to deliver a better experience for all users.

 

In addition to measuring your compliance, they also provide a clear picture of your progress over time, so you can track the impact of your improvements and maintain ongoing accessibility.

The two main types are automated and manual monitoring. Together, they provide you with a comprehensive view of how accessible your site is and where improvements are needed.

 

  • Automated monitoring uses specialised web accessibility monitoring tools to scan your website for non-compliant features and common issues, such as missing alt text, poor colour contrast, or keyword navigability issues. These tools can also provide instant alerts for when site elements present accessibility risks and site health reports so you can prioritise any issues.

  • Manual monitoring is where accessibility experts and testers come in to review your site as a real user would, often using assistive technologies like screen readers. They will usually check how easy it is to navigate through pages, interact with content, and understand messages or instructions. The aim is to identify any areas which may present barriers for individuals with disabilities.

Accessibility monitoring is crucial for ensuring that everyone can use and experience your site in the same way, regardless of ability. It is also essential for staying compliant with standards like WCAG and with laws like The European Accessibility Act 2025.

 

Without regular monitoring, accessibility issues can easily appear when new pages are added, content is updated, or designs are changed.

 

Continuous website accessibility monitoring gives you a framework to:

  • Stay compliant

  • Improve user experience

  • Respond to issues quickly

  • Track progress over time

Accessibility monitoring should be integrated into your process rather than a one-time check. Websites can change frequently, with new pages, designs, and content changes, but each update can introduce accessibility issues.

 

Continuous monitoring, both manual and through an automated website monitor, is recommended to catch any issues as soon as they appear, particularly after any big changes, such as adding interactive elements, redesigns, and when legal or accessibility guidelines are updated.

 

Even without significant changes, monitoring should be a consistent part of your organisations website maintenance.

 

The more you test the better, but for those looking for an exact amount, ideally once a month is a good starting point to catch any emerging issues.

Book a meeting

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Signup

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.